On behalf of the Free Speech Coalition, the trade association of the adult entertainment industry, we present our Year 2005 White Paper, a report designed to provide accurate information about the nation's multi-billion dollar adult entertainment industry.

We offer this document in the hope that it will provide lawmakers and the public with a better understanding of adult entertainment and its place in our society. We hope this report will be used as an educational tool and will provide insight into an industry heavily regulated, but seriously misunderstood, by government.

 

Michelle L. Freridge, Executive Director

Jeffrey J. Douglas, Esq., Chair and General Counsel

Mark Kernes, FSC Director and Senior Editor for Adult Video News

 

Free Speech Coalition

P.O. Box 10480

Canoga Park, CA 91309

866-372-9373

 

CONTENTS:

I           Industry Statistics -- The United States

            II          Industry Statistics -- Benefits to California

III        Definitions: Adult Entertainment, Pornography, Obscenity

IV        A Basic Right: The Private Enjoyment of Adult Entertainment

V         The Mainstreaming of Adult Entertainment

VI        The Adult Entertainment Industry and HIV

VII       Free Speech Coalition and Public Policy

 

I.  INDUSTRY STATISTICS - THE UNITED STATES

 

Overall

      In February of 1997, US News & World Report stated that adult entertainment was estimated to be an $8 billion economic giant. The industry trade publication, Adult Video News, estimated that the true figure, even then, was  $2-$3 billion higher than that. Few doubt that adult entertainment revenues today are much higher than they were in 1997. Various numbers get thrown around.  Exact, reliable figures are simply not available.

      What is certain is this: adult entertainment is a significant economic engine. The following compilations of the best available data leave little doubt of the contribution of the industry to the economic prosperity of the nation. The State of California  -- since major segments of the adult industry are located there -- is especially benefited economically.

 

NOTES ON SOURCES FOR STATISTICS

            The information used in the following statistical reports was derived from numerous sources, including: a survey of 5000 retailers who answered an annual national questionnaire composed and analyzed by Adult Video News (AVN), the trade publication of the adult video industry (See AVN, January 2003); Paul Kagan & Associates and the Video Software Dealers Association (VSDA), the trade association for the entire home video industry, provided certain relevant information. Additional data came from a special survey of mail order and Internet content providers and from AVN Online. Information in the exotic dance sections of this report is based on statistics collected from targeted cities and specific clubs. Performers have also provided input.

            Other information was drawn from a 2004 report by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (The CREW report, in turn, drew heavily from Obscene Profits: The Entrepreneurs of Pornography in the Cyber Age by Frederick S. Lane). Other sources include Yahoo! Internet Life, "Sex and the Internet - A Special Report,O May 2001; A National Research Council Report; an MSNBC survey; a Forrester research report; a 2002 US National Academies' report on Youth, Pornography & the Internet; a U.S. News and World Report story; a 2003 study by Palisade Systems; and a report by Websense, Inc., a provider of employee filtering software.

 

 

DVD And Video

      The Video Software Dealers Association (VSDA) estimates that of the 60,000 retail outlets in the United States that stock home video, 25,000 outlets carry adult titles. These retailers include such major chains as Virgin Megastores, The Wherehouse, Tower Video, Palmer Video, Movies Unlimited, West Coast Video, Movie Gallery and many others. In addition, hundreds of small boutiques, large mail order companies and Internet websites sell adult tapes directly to consumers.

      In the United States in 2002, adult video and DVD rentals and sales accounted for 29.1% of the gross income in stores that carry both mainstream and adult products, for a volume of over $3.95 billion. This figure includes transactions in retail outlets but does not include sales through mail order or over the Internet.

 

      Hotel Adult Movie Rentals

         An estimated 40 percent of the nation's hotels offer adult movie options, according to a 2004 report by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW). Adult movies account for about 90 percent of pay-per-view revenue, says the CREW report. Based on estimates provided by the hotel industry, at least half of all guests at hotels such as Marriott and Holiday Inn pay to view adult movies. These orders result in approximately $190 million a year in sales.

 

         Fantasy Phone Sex

            Fantasy phone sex generates between $750 million and $1 billion in revenues each year with as much as 50 percent being retained by U.S. long distance carriers (from the CREW report).

 

Satellite And Cable

Satellite and cable operators, according to Kagan Research, earn just under $800 million a year from adult movie subscriptions and pay-per-view orders, roughly 40% of pay-TV on-demand revenue. All of the leading cable and satellite TV providers - including Dish Network, DirecTV, Comcast and Adelphia offer adult content (Adelphia offers soft-core programming only).

 

The Internet

An estimated 34 million people visited adult entertainment sites in August 2003, about one in four Internet users in the U.S. (Nielsen/NetRatings, August 2003).

One percent of American websites are adult in nature (SurfWatch.com, June 2000). However, these sites account for almost 40% of all Internet traffic (SexTracker.com, May 2001) and are by far the most visited sites on the Internet.

The 2002 US National Academies' report on Youth, Pornography & the Internet noted that the number of paying subscribers to adult Websites is on the order of several million in the United States, and may be as high as 10 million. On average, a paid subscription generates $20 to $40 per month in revenue.

Traffic volume is staggering. SexTracker, a Web service that keeps an eye on some 26,000 adult sites, reports that on an average day as many as 60 million unique visitors land upon those sites. Taken together, the top five sex sites receive just under 4 million unique visitors every day. To put that in perspective: The world's top five news sites in 2001, including such heavyweights as MSNBC.com and CNN.com, received a total of only about 2.5 million unique visitors per day." (Yahoo! Internet Life, "Sex and the Internet - A Special Report", May 2001.)

            A 2001 Forrester Research report claimed 19% of North American users were regular visitors to adult content sites. Of that 19% approximately one in four were women, 46% were married and 33% had children.

Websense, Inc. a provider of employee filtering software, says that the number of adult entertainment Websites in their URL database is more than 17 times greater than it was just four years ago, surging from approximately 88,000 in 2000 to nearly 1.6 million sites in 2004.

 

V.  INDUSTRY STATISTICS ? CALIFORNIA

 

Benefits to California ? The Exotic Dance Industry

In California's exotic dance industry, there are an estimated 7500 full-time dancers with another 5000 working part-time. These entertainers represent a broad range of women, including students, professional women and single mothers as well as exotic dance professionals. What they all have in common is that they enjoy the financial independence. Many also enjoy the performance excitement of exotic dance.

There are over 175 exotic dance clubs in California. The clubs create over 20,000 jobs in the state, while generating almost $1 billion in revenue. The dance industry brings in an estimated $500,000 to local governments in tax revenue.

In the exotic dance industry, many entertainers earn 5-6 times the state's official minimum wage or even more as headliners. Generally, dancers choose their own working environment and work schedules and enjoy a level of financial independence not found by women in other areas, in some cases, opening a business with their earnings. In addition, female dancers earn 3-4 times the amount of money earned by their male counterparts and considerably more than in most traditional female jobs. The adult entertainment industry is one of few industries where this is true.

 

Benefits to California ? Video and DVD Rentals and Sale

In 2003, approximately 2800 retail stores carried adult videos and DVDs for sale and/or rental in the State of California. The average store stocked over 700 different adult tapes and DVDs for rental or sale, with an average of 75 different new titles added weekly. Most stores had a near-complete turnover in adult stock every 12 weeks.

During 2002 in the United States, stores reported a total of 801 million rentals of adult tapes and DVDs, almost all of which were produced in California. Nearly 130 million of those rentals took place here in the state. If each of those rentals were for one day only, at a typical $3 rental fee, a minimum of $31 million sales tax dollars would have been generated for the State of California. Of course, the actual sales tax revenues to the state are much larger, since the average rental is longer than one day and for more than $3.00 per day.

The wholesale sales value of tapes and DVDs sold to retailers from producers and distributors in the United States in 2002 totaled $919 million, with nearly $130 million in wholesale sales to retailers in California.

Adult products are often the primary profit center for non-chain video stores. Adult videos carry higher rental fees, rent for longer periods, and are more likely to convert to sales. Without adult product, many of California's retailers that carry adult videos would be forced out of business, costing the state thousands of jobs.

 

Benefits to California - Manufacturing

      The adult video business is made up of producers, manufacturers (who duplicate and distribute their own as well as other producers' product), wholesale distributors, retailers (including Internet sites) and mail order companies. In California alone, Adult Video News has identified 175 manufacturers, providing employment for almost 5000 California residents. An additional 60 wholesale distributors and mail order outfits in California employ upwards of 1000 more workers.

      These figures do not include the numerous producers and publishers of adult magazines and novelties, which are economically significant industries in their own right.

      Several hundred performers employed in the adult movie industry reside in California, as do thousands of technicians, directors, editors, producers, makeup artists, art directors, designers, photographers, line producers, lighting technicians, cinematographers, artists, computer experts, camera operators, caterers, drivers, janitors, builders, Foley artists, musicians, etc. Each of these employees pays state income taxes.

      Many of the technicians and artists who work in the "mainstream" entertainment industry have previously worked behind the scenes in the adult movie business, demonstrating that the adult industry provides a training ground for people wanting to work in Hollywood. Many continue to work both in mainstream and adult productions.

 

Benefits to California ? Mail Order

Mail order provides a means for distribution of adult products with minimal intrusion into the community, and substantial privacy for the consumer. A survey of mail order providers conducted by the Free Speech Coalition in 1998 established that in that year, there was $200 million in adult video sales, plus additional millions in sales of magazines, lingerie and novelties. The sales of these products generate tax revenue and employment in California, where most of the product manufacturers are located.

Mail order and related shipping in California generates so much revenue that following the 1999 United Parcel Service strike, the U.S. Postal Service assigned a special sales staff to encourage the adult industry to keep using the U.S.P.S.

 

Benefits to California ? The Internet

California has the highest relative percentage of Adult Internet users of any state in the union. In 2000, 13.62 million Californian adults used the Internet, 15.3% of the total United States adult Internet population. (ACNielsen's Homescan Net*Views Survey, May 2000)

Even more important, in terms of benefits to the state, California leads the country in hosting adult websites. These are sources of high-paying, technically sophisticated jobs. Entrepreneurs are attracted to these businesses because of the low capital investment required for start-up. The adult website industry helps keep creative, talented people in California, and attracts additional technicians and entrepreneurs from around the world. Each website also provides employment for models, dancers, photographers, graphic artists and many others.

 

III.  DEFINITIONS: ADULT ENTERTAINMENT, PORNOGRAPHY, OBSCENITY

 

In this paper we have used the term Oadult entertainmentO rather than Opornography,O although, of course, many forms of adult entertainment are referred to as pornography in the common usage. However, the word is frequently misused by those who try to equate Opornography,O a word with no legal meaning, with Oobscenity,O a term which has a legal meaning as defined by the United States Supreme Court in Miller v. California (1973).

Obscenity is material deemed by a jury to be outside of the protection of the First Amendment, criminalized by California and most other states as well as in federal law. Pornography, on the other hand, unless it is determined to be obscene in the courts, is fully protected by the First Amendment. In fact, Webster's dictionary defines pornography as "writings, pictures, etc. intended primarily to arouse sexual desire." By this definition, much of society's poetry, music and other art forms could be described as "pornographic." Henry Miller's Tropic of Cancer, James Joyce's Ulysses and the film Carnal Knowledge and dozens of other literary works, museum exhibits and artworks, as well as adult entertainment products have been accused of being Oobscene.O Almost all of them have been vindicated in court and restored to the marketplace.

While community standards play a significant role in determining what is legally obscene, the fact is that because one community is offended by a book, film, or website does not render the communication illegal. Only a small percentage of commercial adult entertainment has ever been charged as being obscene; and of those, few have been convicted. Moreover, titles condemned as obscene in one jurisdiction might be deemed to be perfectly acceptable in most other parts of the country.

Another problem with the word OpornographyO is that our society is greatly (and rightly) concerned with the problem of materials involving sexual abuse of children, often called Ochild pornography.O Those who wish to portray adult entertainment as evil or illegal intentionally confuse the words Ochild pornographyO and OpornographyO as they try to influence legislation or public policy, thus making it appear that the two are one and the same.

Nothing could be further from the truth. Adult videotapes sold in general release and adult video stores include only consenting adults. Careful records are kept documenting the ages of all participants. Likewise, in the exotic dance portion of the industry, all dancers are required to be of legal age and are recognized as consenting adults based on documents that must be presented to the club by the dancers themselves.

The word OpornographyO is also frequently misused by those who seek to portray adult entertainment as violent, involving exploitation, rape and coercion of various kinds. While it is true that a small sub-genre of adult product includes thematic portrayals of non-consensual sexuality, materials made and distributed by the professional adult entertainment industry in the United States do not contain any actual rape, coerced sex, sex with animals, violence, incest or child pornography. Furthermore, easily 90% of the material produced and distributed over the past 15 years portrays fully consensual acts (oral sex, anal sex, group sex, etc.). Most of the remaining 10% is classified as specialty material (i.e., foot fetish, tickling fetish, bondage, spanking, etc.) which generally does not contain explicit sex, but which still involves, and is consumed exclusively by, consenting adults.

 

IV.  A BASIC RIGHT: THE PRIVATE ENJOYMENT OF ADULT ENTERTAINMENT

Looking back as far as the first publication of Playboy in the Fifties and topless craze in San Francisco in the early Sixties, one can see a natural evolution in which the adult entertainment industry has both benefited, and benefited from, the general liberalizing of attitudes about sexuality in this country.

Over the last twenty years, technological advances have accelerated the liberalizing trend. First videocassettes, and later the Internet, have made it possible for individuals and couples to enjoy adult entertainment in private. VCRs have allowed adult entertainment in the privacy of bedrooms. Advancing Internet technology makes it possible, through filters and monitoring software, to shield children from adult materials and to protect adults from exposure to content they might consider offensive.

In fact, families are taking advantage of filtering technology at a substantial and growing rate. A 2005 survey by the Pew Internet and American Life Project shows that 54% of Internet-connected families now use some sort of filter or monitoring software, up from 41% of Internet-connected families who used filters in 2000. The filters tend to be used by parents who themselves are frequent users of the Internet and who have middle-school-age children. Parents who have older children and who are less tech-savvy are less likely to use filters. Clearly the future is promising for those who want to shield children and non-consenting adults from sexually-explicit materials, while at the same time allowing freedom for the private, adult enjoyment of erotic materials.

In theory, as adult entertainment becomes more personal and private, public policy should adjust accordingly with less regulation. After all, what business is it of government what form of entertainment adults choose in private? Alas, the current trend is in the opposite direction. Social conservatives, enjoying a window of opportunity for their agendas in Washington, would roll back sexual liberalism in its entirety if they could, from Cable TV to Hollywood films. Failing that, they seem determined to inflict punishment on individuals involved in adult entertainment, using obscenity law enforcement.  U.S Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez has announced he intends to aggressively prosecute obscenity cases. Conservatives in Congress and in the administration are urging him on. The Department of Justice has already initiated obscenity indictments against large distributors who sell standard-fare adult entertainment in Main Street adult video shops.

  The problem with using criminal obscenity prosecutions to attack the adult entertainment industry is that this approach threatens a few individuals with disproportionately severe punishment -- penalties for obscenity convictions have been ratcheted up over the years until they are now on a par with terrorism or armed robbery -- for doing nothing more than providing entertainment for millions of fully consenting, appreciative adults -- entertainment that is enjoyed in private.

An escalating attack against freedom of expression is also taking place at state and local levels. Adult entertainment foes use local ordinances in an effort to block exotic dance clubs and adult stores.  Zoning laws often require adult stores to locate in outlying industrial zones. In spite of this, local patrons of the clubs and stores remain plentiful and the adult businesses prosper. Most dance clubs no longer fit the run-down, sleazy stereotype of yesteryear, but are upscale and thriving, with lots of customers. What is the justification for laws that discriminate against clubs and adult stores that serve millions of fully consenting, appreciative adults, behind closed doors?

 

V.  THE MAINSTREAMING OF ADULT ENTERTAINMENT

 

The fact that adult entertainment has become widely accepted by Americans across the nation is the defining basis of this White Paper. There are many indicators that adult entertainment has entered the mainstream, especially in recent years. Adult stars appear in mainstream films and on talk shows. There are best-selling books by adult entertainment personalities. Films celebrate industry heroes like Larry Flynt.

All this infuriates social conservatives, who understand that the stakes are high. To put the issue starkly, if adult entertainment is in fact widely accepted by mainstream populations, then efforts to censor it are clearly misguided and unfair to both consumers and producers.

Furthermore, if adult entertainment is in fact widely accepted by mainstream populations, then the use of criminal obscenity law to regulate it is unconstitutional. In order to decide materials are obscene, according to a criterion set down by the Supreme Court in Miller v California in 1973, an average person must consider those materials to be patently offensive by contemporary community standards. How can it be argued that materials enjoyed by large segments of the population are patently offensive to the average person? Social conservatives contend that adult entertainment and obscenity are virtually synonymous. They are not -- for one reason simply because the average person does not find the vast majority of adult entertainment offensive. Quite the contrary.  If Oaverage personO is defined by a statistical median, then the average person is more likely to enjoy adult entertainment than be offended by it.

This is true even in the so-called Ored states,O as the following examples document.

Utah County, Utah, is one of the most conservative communities in the nation, judging from voting records in presidential elections. In a mid-1990s court case, Randy Spencer, a court-appointed attorney, defended a Utah County video store whose owner had been charged with 15 counts of obscenity for renting adult tapes. The prosecutors claimed the store was violating the community standards of suburban Provo.

            Spencer subpoenaed records that showed the following: Utah County cable subscribers had ordered at least 20,000 explicit movies in the past two years; a local video store was deriving 20 percent of its rental sales from adult movies, even though adult movies only made up 2 percent of the store's inventory; a nearby adult store was racking up on average $111,000 dollars per year selling sex toys and other adult fare; and the Provo Marriott, literally across the street from the courthouse, had sold 3,448 adult pay-per-view movie rentals in 1998 alone. Spencer won the case.

            Another example:  In 2001, when prosecutors in ultra-conservative Hamilton County, Ohio, filed obscenity charges against two local video stores for selling adult videos, The Cincinnati Enquirer launched an investigation of community standards.

            Said the Enquirer:

            In 2000, more than 21,000 Hamilton County residents purchased 26,000 explicit videos from one of the nation's largest mail-order companies. A company spokeswoman described those sales as typical for a community of this sizeE. In January of 2001, 182,000 Greater Cincinnati residents -- an estimated 70,000 from Hamilton County -- visited an adult Web site at least once. Nielsen?NetRatings found that 21.8 percent of all residents in Hamilton County who went online visited an adult site. The national average per month was 21.4 percent. In 2001 Hamilton County, residents bought adult movies on pay-per-view TV at about the same rate as viewers did in other mid-sized TV markets. The numbers suggest county residents are quiet contributors to the adult industry's rapid growth. And with every purchase, they change Hamilton County's long-held notion of a community standard.O        The video store owner who fought the obscenity charges in a court trial was acquitted.

As these examples show, adult entertainment is popular even in conservative regions of the country. Of course, those who enjoy adult materials often do not announce themselves. Such matters remain, for many, private and personal.  Nonetheless, erotic fantasy -- portrayed by adults, for adults -- no longer carries the weight of shame or fear it once did. Thanks in major part to the Internet, and to the anonymity and privacy that the Internet allows, there has been an enormous increase in the sheer numbers of Americans enjoying adult entertainment.

At the same time that millions are partaking of adult entertainment in private, many others openly celebrate the genre. At the Adult Entertainment Expo, which is held every year concurrently with the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas, attendance is extraordinary. Tens of thousands of people visit daily. It's much the same at other national shows. The popularity of adult entertainment was nicely illustrated one year when the adult section was moved to separate quarters at the East Coast Video Show. OMainstreamO exhibitors complained strenuously because of the fall off of interest in their exhibitions.

 

The Future:

 

As adult entertainment becomes more accepted in this country, we look forward to more and more of the benefits of mature, liberal attitudes about sexuality. It could be, someday, the same here as it is in Europe, where the distinction between OadultO and OmainstreamO is not as pronounced, and where people more openly appreciate adult entertainment. At the Cannes Film Festival, for example, California-produced adult movies are regularly the top award winners of the Hot D'Or awards, sponsored by Hot Video magazine, Europe's premier adult video magazine. In this country, the AVN Awards, which annually honor the finest adult films and videos, are the subjects of intense international interest and acclaim.

 

VI.   THE ADULT ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY AND HIV

 

Despite the fact that on-set practices as well as testing programs within the adult video industry delayed the advent of HIV in performer ranks for over 15 years, in early 1998 five performers tested positive for the disease. The impact of this proved to be a wake-up call, as performers and companies faced the immediate need for a no-nonsense, state of the art HIV testing program.

Today the adult video industry has just such a program, thanks to the Adult Industry Medical (AIM) Healthcare Foundation. Founded by Sharon Mitchell, Ph.D., AIM is in its 6th year of service to the industry (and the general public) and works cooperatively with the Los Angeles County Health Department.

In conjunction with the Los Angeles Department of Health Services, AIM has created a set of guidelines for the adult entertainment industry based on both County concerns and the wisdom of industry insiders.

Every 30 days, each performer voluntarily tests for HIV by means of the best test available, the PCR-DNA test. Compliance with the testing regimen is nearly universal among performers. The artists inspect certified copies of each other's HIV tests before performances. There are also monthly tests for chlamydia,Chlamydia, gonorrhea and syphilis.

In addition AIM guidelines call for using condoms whenever and wherever possible, monthly certified counseling as well as notification and treatment protocols if a performer were to be tested HIV positive. Routine Hepatitis and STD testing for a wide range of diseases is also recommended and routinely provided, as well as treatment when required. AIM has over 14 local testing sites in southern California and 40 nationwide. All staff are counselors certified by the Office of AIDS Policy and Program and by the County Department of Health Services.

In the spring of 2004, four adult performers contracted HIV, a tragic fact that resulted in great consternation within the industry and a media firestorm without. Some called for increased regulation. However, the AIM system, designed to quickly identify and avoid any spread of the virus, worked extremely well to contain the spread of HIV during the emergency. AIM immediately declared a moratorium on any and all sex video shoots until all potentially infected persons could be found, tested and quarantined. Because of the prompt and positive response by most producers, the outbreak was contained to those initial four cases.

In addition, AIM developed a database to track sex scenes by performers so that the genealogy of the disease could be more quickly traced. An additional measure was introduced to deal with the apparent transmission route of the 2004 outbreak, that of travelers from other countries and new people to the industry. In the future, a performer who is new or who has migrated in from elsewhere must enter a quarantine period before they are allowed to work.

            The industry-wide response to the 2004 HIV outbreak points to the maturity of the adult entertainment industry and the strong sense of responsibility most members of the industry feel toward talent and the health risks performers may face in doing their work. Because of industry support, AIM, in cooperation with FSC, was able to halt the spread of infection within the industry and protect the interests of the general public who might come into contact with infected performers.

 

VII.  FSC AND PUBLIC POLICY

 

As the trade association for the adult industry, Free Speech Coalition seeks to influence public policy through education, lobbying and -- as a last resort -- litigation.

 

Education

Free Speech Coalition works to correct misinformation and stereotypes about adult entertainment, providing testimony in the legislative process and being available for interviews in the media. FSC issues press releases, organizes public events, and provides written information such as that contained in this White Paper. FSC maintains a library of information, research data, briefs on new and pending legislation and documents concerning historical legal findings and precedents.

 

Lobbying

Historically, adult entertainment has been regulated with insufficient dialogue between regulators and the industry being regulated. Until recent years, there was no recognized voice for the industry as a whole, other than an occasional lawyer representing an affected business. In recent years that pattern has changed dramatically.  Free Speech Coalition currently employs lobbyists in Sacramento and in Washington, D.C.  FSC also coordinates lobbying efforts with local FSC chapters and with Association of Club Executives (ACE) chapters throughout the country. (ACE is a trade association for the adult nightclub industry.)

FSC also conducts an annual training program to educate members from all sectors of the industry in the political process. With support and supervision by FSC's Legislative Affairs Director Kat Sunlove, small groups of adult industry citizen lobbyists meet with California State legislators and staff to discuss issues related to adult entertainment. The process has proven beneficial on both sides. The industry lobbyists gain a better understanding of the political process; and legislators and staff gain a better understanding of the adult industry.

 

Litigation

FSC enters into litigation when the issues involved are likely to set precedent or have an effect on the entire adult entertainment industry. For example, the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition (2002) overturned federal law that would have criminalized adult actors portraying underage characters in erotic scenes, both in adult entertainment and in mainstream materials.

Currently, FSC has targeted certain sections of 18 U.S.C. ¤ 2257 (the Federal Record-keeping and Labeling law) for litigation. Even in its earlier form, FSC had serious concerns about the 2257 law. However, the law was recently OclarifiedO by the U.S. Department of Justice in a way that will make compliance very difficult, if not impossible, for any adult manufacturer, producer, content provider or website operator. As soon as the final regulations are announced and become official, Free Speech Coalition plans to seek a court injunction against the law on behalf of FSC and its members.

 

            Thank you for your time in considering our positions. If you have any comments or questions, please feel free to contact Executive Director Michelle L. Freridge at the offices of the Free Speech Coalition, (866) 372-9373.