Woodhull Plaintiffs File Motion to Declare FOSTA Unconstitutional (XBIZ)

The Woodhull vs. FOSTA/SESTA fight is not over yet, folx!

~~~

WASHINGTON — The plaintiffs in the Woodhull Freedom Foundation case challenging FOSTA/SESTA filed on Monday a motion asking the D.C. district court for a summary judgment declaring the legislation unconstitutional.

FOSTA, the Woodhull legal team argued, is "unconstitutionally vague and overbroad, is a content-based statute that cannot satisfy strict scrutiny and lacks the necessary scienter [i.e., proof of intent] requirements to be constitutional, and it explicitly is meant to have retroactive reach in both its criminal and civil applications.” 

Read the full article at XBIZ.com

Previous
Previous

FSC PASS Participants to See Record Levels of Reimbursement from Performer Subsidy Fund

Next
Next

How to Overcome the Lasting Effects of COVID-19 on Retail (XBIZ)